requestId:684c3e36794dd0.14998082.
Confucianism is not a singular certificate
Author: Wang Zechun
Source: Author Authorization Confucian Network Published
Song Wei spoke lightly on the scene. Originally Baobao.com was published in “National Research” December 2019
Abstract:Zhang Taiyan believes that the meaning of “Confucianism” is very broad, and can be divided into three types: “Da”, “category” and “private”. He was called “the scholar of the scholar” in “Shi Wenjiezi” and “the scholar of the scholar” and “the scholar of the scholar” were called “the scholar of the scholar” in “Historical Records”, and concluded that Confucianism is equal to the scholar of the scholar; and the scholar refers to all those with Taoism, and thus believes that Confucianism is the “famous name” of the Confucian scholar, which is the statute of the pre-Qin Scriptures, and can cover all thinking doors and prescriptions and techniques. However, the information used by Taiyan in detail lacks to prove this view, that is, there is no “Confucian” that can cover all thinking doors and prescriptions, and “Confucian” is just a special name of Confucius’ school.
Keywords: Confucianism; Academicians; Immortals; Taoism
The concept of “Confucianism” is a common concept in modern Chinese thinking, but Yu Zong believes that “what is the original meaning of ‘Confucianism’? People who ordinary people who talk about Chinese academic history and advocate Confucianism seem to have no explanation yet”[①]. Zhang Taiyan’s “Original Confucianism” [②] is a major article in modern times that discusses “Confucianism”. Zhang Taiyan believed that “the meaning of Confucianism is very broad”[④]. Among them, Confucianism, as “famous name”, can refer to all thinking doors and prescriptions and techniques. Zhang Taiyan’s article has a profound influence and has attracted the attention of many students, but the key points on the side are different [⑤]. This view of Zhang Taiyan may be clearly agreed, may be raised with doubts, or may be denied. The following article will give a brief introduction to the above-mentioned scholars’ discussion on the topic of 平台.
Clearly praise the same chapter Taiyan’s view. Although Hu Ying did not agree with Zhang Taiyan’s “The Original Religion” in “Speaking of Confucianism”, and used it to make some excuses, he believed that “Taiyan Teacher Chief Teacher said: “The name of Confucianism was an expert in ancient times.” This statement is not suspicious.” [⑥]
clearly opposed Zhang Taiyan’s views. Guo Moruo believed that “the evidence of the scholars of the Qin Dynasty, the scholars of the Qin Dynasty, was not known as the Confucians….The Confucians should have been the special number of the ‘Ru Shishou Master, the Chief Teacher,’.”[⑦] The word “Confucian” is explained from the perspective of textual interpretation, and believes that “the ancient Confucianism that modern people have recommended to explain the word “Confucian” from the perspective of “Shiwen” is actually just a mistake” [⑧], and there is no Confucianism that “all those who have learned are affected by it.”
This article basically follows the views of Guo Moruo and the word “Shiwen”, and believes that Baoqing It is said that “Confucianism” cannot contain all thinking and prescriptions and techniques in modern times, but is only a special name of Confucius’ school. Do not analyze other issues, and do not explore the source of Confucianism [⑨]. The method of research and discussion is not used to use textual training methods formula [⑩]; it is just to analyze and verify the meaning of the concept of “Confucianism” in the specific applications of the Han Dynasty and before by analyzing and certifying the information that Zhang Taiyan used as a criticism, and to evaluate the meaning of “Confucianism” in the specific applications of the Han Dynasty and before.
1
Zhang Taiyan interprets “Confucianism” as “a scholar The first statement of “is “Confucianism is soft, and the name of a scholar” in Xu Shen’s “Shi Wenjiezi”. Xu Shen did not explain the meaning of “a scholar” in a step-by-step manner. Zhang Taiyan did not analyze “a scholar” and directly defined that all those with Taoism can include “Tao, Mo, criminal law, yinyang, and immortals, with records of misfortunes next to it”[11], and It is not considered by the Emperor Zhuzong that “Zhang took a fancy to the ‘artists’ and described the primitive Confucian scholars as ‘artists’”[12]; Emperor Zhuzong that “the word ‘art’ does not necessarily refer to the number of arts”, and started from the word “正” in “Saiwenjiezi” and “正 is the way of the city. From the way of action, the art voice” to “正” is believed to be “正”[13]Baohaowang VIP, “The Confucian scholars in “Shiwen” call them “a scholars” generally refer to ‘people with Taoism’” [14]. In fact, the two people have no essential differences in their interpretation of “a scholars”. All those with Taoism are the same as those with Taoism’”; it’s just that Zhang Taiyan believes that all those with Taoism can include other schools of thought, while the sect limits “a person with Taoism” to Confucius’ school.
Zhang Taiyan and the Emperor of the Praise have concluded a disagreement based on the same “Artist”. The reason is that they have different understandings about the “Artist”. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the meaning of “Artist” in “Shi Wenjiezi”. There are two important ways to define the meaning of “Artist”. One is the method of textual training, which is adopted by the Emperor of the Praise; the other is the method of data registration [15].
The argument of the Emperor of the Praise seems to be serious, and the data is detailedBaobao.com is true, but a careful analysis will reveal a problem. First, the “artistic” of “Shi Wen Jiezi” used “Shi Wen Jiezi” to explain the “artistic” of “Artist” is inconsistent with his overall understanding of “Shi Wen Jiezi”He thought, “The book “Speaking” is often said by people, and sometimes it contains some words of discussion and rationality, and does not express the full text” [16]. Secondly, although there is an explanation of “正, Taoism is the Taoist in the middle of the universe” in “Shiwenjiezi”, the word “正” in “正” contains extremely broad meanings” [17]. I don’t know why “正” with a broad meaning means “正”, and “正” means “正” is “a person with Taoism”. The problem exists is that “one is that the font meaning of the text is often in the extension and transformation, and the other is that it is pushed down from the previous step Short-term maintenance is a step where only the ability is sufficient but not necessarily, so it still needs to be verified in the data. The learning style of the Ruan Yuan system, This kind of ability is regarded as a certainty and the conditions of multiple meanings are regarded as a one-word condition.”[18] Again, even though the “artist” is “people with Taoism”, the pre-Qin monks were all Taoists, other monks were eliminated, including Taoism named “Tao”. As long as the Confucius school was the “people with Taoism” he believed. Therefore, the “Confucian” mentioned by the Emperor Zhuzong is just a clear conclusion of the Confucius School, but it was developed by the “Confucian, the name of the scholar”, and interpreting the “cultivist” as “people with Taoism”, and then equating the “people with Taoism” with the same arguments as the Confucius School is not serious.
Another way is the method of data decoction, which is a concept that Xu Xie views “temporary artificiality”. He believed that “In this method, it is not a question of the shape and the sound of characters, but rather a meaning obtained from the shape and the sound of characters. In the structure of a sentence and the high and low text of a chapter, they are compared with each other to find that the text is smoother. Further, a step-by-step process will refer to relevant information from a certain era, a certain book, or a certain After the relevant information of the family is studied, they are more different and interrogated, in order to obtain a more practical conclusion on the broader landscape and foundation. ”[19]
There are many technicians in “Historical Records” and “Han Books”, all refer to technicians. Among other pre-Qin and Han Scriptures, the wise men who a
發佈留言